On 16/09/2016 16:35, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 03:45:12PM +0200, Julien Grall wrote:
On 16/09/2016 15:41, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 03:35:21PM +0200, Julien Grall wrote:
On 11/09/2016 22:35, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
- Addressed the two outstanding concerns: CPU bit feature to test alternative
test-case, and errata #843419 on some Cortex-A53
I am a bit confused. I haven't spotted any specific code for this. How did
you handle it?
livepatch: x86, ARM, alternative: Expose FEATURE_LIVEPATCH
AFAICT, this only handles this first part (CPU bit feature) not the errata
#843419. Did I miss anything?
My recollection is (from
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:49:55 +0100
From: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com>,
xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org, kon...@kernel.org, ross.lagerw...@citrix.com,
sstabell...@kernel.org, Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Livepatch for ARM 64 and 32.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
"> - #13 "livepatch: Initial ARM64 support."
Need to look in erratum #843419 on some Cortex-A53 and figuring
out how to avoid payloads having R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 relocations.
I will not considered this has a blocker for this series. Having livepatching
on all the other boards for Xen 4.8 would still be awesome :).
So I moved it off to 4.9 list.
Oh, I understood "Addressed the two outstanding concerns" as "It was
fixed in the code". Maybe I was expecting too much to shrink down my
todo list ^^.
Xen-devel mailing list