On 06/02/18 15:42, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hi Volodymyr,
On 5 February 2018 at 15:20, Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote:Currently, the behavior of do_common_cpu will slightly change depending on the PSCI version passed in parameter. Looking at the code, more the specific 0.2 behavior could move out of the function or adapted for 0.1: - x0/r0 can be updated on PSCI 0.1 because general purpose registers are undefined upon CPU on. - PSCI 0.1 does not defined PSCI_ALREADY_ON. However, it would be safer to bail out if the CPU is already on. Based on this, the parameter 'ver' is removed and do_psci_cpu_on (implementation for PSCI 0.1) is adapted to avoid returning PSCI_ALREADY_ON. Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com>Reviewed-by: Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babc...@epam.com>
Thank you for the reviewed. FIY, I moved that patch towards the end of the series as it is not necessary for backporting. I kept your reviewed-by because there are no clash.
I hope that is fine for you. Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
