Hi Julien,

On 8 February 2018 at 20:12, Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote:

Currently, the behavior of do_common_cpu will slightly change depending
>>> on the PSCI version passed in parameter. Looking at the code, more the
>>> specific 0.2 behavior could move out of the function or adapted for 0.1:
>>>
>>>      - x0/r0 can be updated on PSCI 0.1 because general purpose registers
>>>      are undefined upon CPU on.
>>>      - PSCI 0.1 does not defined PSCI_ALREADY_ON. However, it would be
>>>      safer to bail out if the CPU is already on.
>>>
>>> Based on this, the parameter 'ver' is removed and do_psci_cpu_on
>>> (implementation for PSCI 0.1) is adapted to avoid returning
>>> PSCI_ALREADY_ON.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babc...@epam.com>
>
>
> Thank you for the reviewed. FIY, I moved that patch towards the end of the
> series as it is not necessary for backporting. I kept your reviewed-by
> because there are no clash.
>
> I hope that is fine for you.
Yes, I'm perfectly fine with this.


-- 
WBR Volodymyr Babchuk aka lorc [+380976646013]
mailto: vlad.babc...@gmail.com

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to