>>> On 05.03.18 at 15:11, <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote: > On 05/03/18 14:00, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 05.03.18 at 14:43, <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote: >>> Anyway, I don't have much knowledge on the x86 to make the modification >>> that you suggested. So I am going to revert to _mfn(0) for x86. >> >> I'd prefer if you didn't, but well, it'll be one of us to clean it up >> then. > I can keep as INVALID_MFN. But then either you or Andrew (or anyone x86 > folks) would have to provide the patch to skip incrementing invalid MFN > (if I understood correctly your request).
Sigh - this should go together imo. While wrongly incrementing from zero was bad, wrongly wrapping from INVALID_MFN makes things worse. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
