>>> Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> 03/09/18 6:30 PM >>>
>On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 07:38:36AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 05.03.18 at 15:11, <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote:
>> > On 05/03/18 14:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>>>> On 05.03.18 at 14:43, <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote:
>> >>> Anyway, I don't have much knowledge on the x86 to make the modification
>> >>> that you suggested. So I am going to revert to _mfn(0) for x86.
>> >> 
>> >> I'd prefer if you didn't, but well, it'll be one of us to clean it up
>> >> then.
>> > I can keep as INVALID_MFN. But then either you or Andrew (or anyone x86 
>> > folks) would have to provide the patch to skip incrementing invalid MFN 
>> > (if I understood correctly your request).
>> 
>> Sigh - this should go together imo. While wrongly incrementing from
>> zero was bad, wrongly wrapping from INVALID_MFN makes things
>> worse.
>
>Try this patch?

Looks fine; Julien, do you want to fold this in?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to