On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 08:10:12AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 06.07.2021 09:37, Jan Beulich wrote: > > On 28.06.2021 13:52, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> If anything, a check covering a wider range of invalid M2P entries ought > >> to be used (e.g. VALID_M2P()). But since everything is fully under Xen's > >> control at this stage, simply remove the BUG_ON(). > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> > > > > I didn't expect this to be controversial, so may I please ask for an ack > > (or otherwise)? > > To be quite honest, I find it very strange that even simple changes like > this one sit un-responded to for months. This isn't the only example ...
Sorry, I'm trying to catch up with reviews, but after being away so long it's hard to figure out what's pending. Regards, Roger.
