On 02.02.2022 16:14, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 10:41:53AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Do away with the "pod_target_out_unlock" label. In particular by folding >> if()-s, the logic can be expressed with less code (and no goto-s) this >> way. >> >> Limit scope of "p2m", constifying it at the same time. > > Is this stale? I cannot find any reference to a p2m variable in the > chunks below.
Indeed it is, leftover from rebasing over the introduction of p2m_pod_get_mem_target() in what is now patch 1. Dropped. Jan
