On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 04:29:37PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 02.02.2022 16:14, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 10:41:53AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> Do away with the "pod_target_out_unlock" label. In particular by folding > >> if()-s, the logic can be expressed with less code (and no goto-s) this > >> way. > >> > >> Limit scope of "p2m", constifying it at the same time. > > > > Is this stale? I cannot find any reference to a p2m variable in the > > chunks below. > > Indeed it is, leftover from rebasing over the introduction of > p2m_pod_get_mem_target() in what is now patch 1. Dropped.
I'm happy with this change with the commit adjusted: Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <[email protected]> Not sure if you can commit this now regardless of patch 1? Thanks, Roger.
