Hi Jan, > -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > Sent: 2022年7月12日 22:26 > To: Wei Chen <wei.c...@arm.com> > Cc: nd <n...@arm.com>; Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; Roger Pau > Monné <roger....@citrix.com>; Wei Liu <w...@xen.org>; George Dunlap > <george.dun...@citrix.com>; Julien Grall <jul...@xen.org>; Stefano > Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org>; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] xen/x86: rename bad_srat to numa_bad > > On 08.07.2022 16:54, Wei Chen wrote: > > When NUMA initialization code is failed in scanning SRAT. It will > > call bad_srat to set disable NUMA and clear relate data. But this > > name is ACPI specific, we have moved generically usable NUMA codes > > to common, bad_srat has came with these codes to common code. But > > it's not reasonable for other NUMA implementations to implement a > > fall back function named bad_srat. So in this patch, we rename > > bad_srat to numa_bad. > > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Chen <wei.c...@arm.com> > > --- > > v1 -> v2: > > 1. New in v2. > > I think this wants to come before moving to common code. And I'd > also like you to consider using e.g. numa_fw_bad() or > numa_firmware_bad() to better reflect the original purpose. >
Ok, I will re-order the series and update the function names. Thanks, Wei Chen > Jan