Hi Jan,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
> Sent: 2022年7月12日 22:26
> To: Wei Chen <wei.c...@arm.com>
> Cc: nd <n...@arm.com>; Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; Roger Pau
> Monné <roger....@citrix.com>; Wei Liu <w...@xen.org>; George Dunlap
> <george.dun...@citrix.com>; Julien Grall <jul...@xen.org>; Stefano
> Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org>; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] xen/x86: rename bad_srat to numa_bad
> 
> On 08.07.2022 16:54, Wei Chen wrote:
> > When NUMA initialization code is failed in scanning SRAT. It will
> > call bad_srat to set disable NUMA and clear relate data. But this
> > name is ACPI specific, we have moved generically usable NUMA codes
> > to common, bad_srat has came with these codes to common code. But
> > it's not reasonable for other NUMA implementations to implement a
> > fall back function named bad_srat. So in this patch, we rename
> > bad_srat to numa_bad.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Chen <wei.c...@arm.com>
> > ---
> > v1 -> v2:
> > 1. New in v2.
> 
> I think this wants to come before moving to common code. And I'd
> also like you to consider using e.g. numa_fw_bad() or
> numa_firmware_bad() to better reflect the original purpose.
> 

Ok, I will re-order the series and update the function names.

Thanks,
Wei Chen

> Jan

Reply via email to