On Sat, 14 Apr 2018, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roger Pau Monne
> > Sent: 13 April 2018 20:53
> > To: Lars Kurth <lars.ku...@citrix.com>
> > Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>; Daniel Smith
> > <dpsm...@apertussolutions.com>; Alexey G <x19...@gmail.com>; Stefano
> > Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org>; Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com>;
> > Paul
> > Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com>; Christopher Clark
> > <christopher.w.cl...@gmail.com>; Rich Persaud <pers...@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:59:15PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 13/04/2018, 11:01, "Roger Pau Monne" <roger....@citrix.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:50:00PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12/04/2018, 17:41, "Roger Pau Monne" <roger....@citrix.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:32:57PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > may work. For me Mon, Wed and Fri’s generally work at those
> > time-slots.
> > > > > Next week is a little busy for me, so I would prefer the
> > > following
> > week.
> > > > > If you could fill out the following Google poll, if this
> > > week works
> > that
> > > > > would be great. Otherwise please scream.
> > > >
> > > > I'm afraid I'm on vacations from the 21st to the 29th of April,
> > > so I
> > > > won't be able to join the meeting unless we move it to the week
> > after.
> > > > Let's see what people think of the current dates.
> > > >
> > > > Roger.
> > > >
> > > > Hi, I changed the dates to the week after. Poll so far has been
> > invalidated.
> > > >
> > > > See https://doodle.com/poll/gdnmcrvnibmw563n
> > >
> > > Thanks! I've already fixed my vote.
> > >
> > > I guess this will come later, but we need a clear agenda of items
> > > because the x86 and ARM topics are probably going to be completely
> > > different (albeit all related to PCI).
> > >
> > > Royger: I am OK with trying to get a draft agenda in place in this e-mail
> > thread. But I can't drive this, as I don’t understand the issues. But I am
> > happy
> > to collate everything as for the x86 call and write up minutes
> >
> > On the x86 side:
> >
> > - Q35 HVM emulation, adding MCFG support to guests.
>
> One of the issues here is support for multiple external emulators w.r.t.
> config space access.
>
> > - PVH guest pci-passthrough: using the internal vPCI infrastructure.
>
> Let's not distinguish between HVM or PVH here. We want to use the same
> passthrough mechanisms for both.
Ideally, we'll use the same mechanism for ARM too.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
