On 02/11/2022 12:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.11.2022 12:28, Anthony PERARD wrote:
>> Fixes: 81f559e97974 ("make error codes a formal part of the ABI")
>> Reported-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.per...@citrix.com>
>> ---
>> xen/include/public/errno.h | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/include/public/errno.h b/xen/include/public/errno.h
>> index 5c53af6af9..6bdc8c5079 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/public/errno.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/public/errno.h
>> @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
>> +
>> /*
>> * There are two expected ways of including this header.
>> *
> Doesn't this require at least part of Stefano's "[PATCH v4 0/4] introduce
> SPDX" as a prereq?
No.
A retroactive commentary on SPDX tags doesn't change the validity of the
tags themselves, nor the fact they've been a specifically agreed thing
for years now (considering it was Lars who settled the SPDX debate with
an explicit yes).
~Andrew
