Hi Julien, > -----Original Message----- > From: Julien Grall <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Use EfiACPIReclaimMemory for ESRT > > Hi, > > >>> Signed-off-by: Demi Marie Obenour <[email protected]> > >> > >> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> > >> > >>> Should this be included in 4.17? It is a bug fix for a feature new to > >>> 4.17, so I suspect yes, but it is ultimately up to Henry Wang. The code > >>> is identical to v2, but I have improved the commit message. > >> > >> It may be too late now, looking at the state of the tree. Henry, Julien? > > > > Like I said in v2, I don't object the change if you would like to include > > this > patch > > to 4.17, so if you are sure this patch is safe and want to commit it, feel > > free > to add: > > > > Release-acked-by: Henry Wang <[email protected]> > > > > Since we also need to commit: > > "[PATCH for-4.17] SUPPORT.md: Define support lifetime" so from my side > > I am no problem. Julien might have different opinion though, if Julien > object > > the change I would like to respect his opinion and leave this patch > uncommitted. > > I have committed it after SUPPORT.md. So if for some reasons we are seen > any issues with Osstest, then I can tag the tree without this patch
This is a great solution :) > (that said, I would rather prefer if we have staging-4.17 == stable-4.17). Looks like now staging-4.17 == stable-4.17 now, with this patch pushed. So we are ready to tag. > > My plan is to prepare the tarball tomorrow. Thanks very much. Kind regards, Henry > > Cheers, > > -- > Julien Grall
