On 6/7/23 03:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 07.06.2023 05:02, Stewart Hildebrand wrote:
>> --- a/xen/include/xen/iommu.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/iommu.h
>> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
>>  #include <xen/spinlock.h>
>>  #include <public/domctl.h>
>>  #include <public/hvm/ioreq.h>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> +#include <asm/acpi.h>
>> +#endif
> 
> This header is supposed to be usable without #ifdef, and then ...

You suggested adding the #ifdef

https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2023-05/msg01409.html

Please clarify

>> @@ -228,12 +232,28 @@ int iommu_release_dt_devices(struct domain *d);
>>   *      (IOMMU is not enabled/present or device is not connected to it).
>>   */
>>  int iommu_add_dt_device(struct dt_device_node *np);
>> +int iommu_add_dt_pci_sideband_ids(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>>
>>  int iommu_do_dt_domctl(struct xen_domctl *, struct domain *,
>>                         XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_domctl_t));
>>
>> +#else /* !HAS_DEVICE_TREE */
>> +static inline int iommu_add_dt_pci_sideband_ids(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> +{
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>>  #endif /* HAS_DEVICE_TREE */
>>
>> +static inline int iommu_add_pci_sideband_ids(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> +{
>> +    int ret = 0;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> +    if ( acpi_disabled )
>> +#endif
> 
> ... you don't need #ifdef here either.
> 
>> +        ret = iommu_add_dt_pci_sideband_ids(pdev);
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
> 
> Also (nit) please follow (partly unwritten, I admit) style guidelines:
> A blank line between declaration(s) and statement(s), and another one
> ahead of a function's main "return".

OK

Reply via email to