On 30/06/2023 10:12 am, Luca Fancellu wrote: > The "dom0less" feature was intended to be the feature where a domU > domain could be launched without the control domain (Dom0) > intervention, however the name seems to suggest that Dom0 cannot > be part of the configuration, while instead it's a possible use case. > > To avoid that, rename the "dom0less" configuration with the name > "hyperlaunch", that is less misleading. > > Signed-off-by: Luca Fancellu <luca.fance...@arm.com> > --- > This is an RFC to get the feeling of the community about the name > change, for now it's everything in one patch just to see how it > will look like, if there is interest on proceeding into it, I can > split in more commit.
Have you discussed this with Dan and Chris at all? You haven't even CC'd them. While there is a lot of end-goal in common between the dom0less and hyperlaunch, and that the name dom0less is deeply misleading, hyperlaunch is specifically not this. ~Andrew
