> On 1 Jul 2023, at 08:53, Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: > > On 30/06/2023 10:12 am, Luca Fancellu wrote: >> The "dom0less" feature was intended to be the feature where a domU >> domain could be launched without the control domain (Dom0) >> intervention, however the name seems to suggest that Dom0 cannot >> be part of the configuration, while instead it's a possible use case. >> >> To avoid that, rename the "dom0less" configuration with the name >> "hyperlaunch", that is less misleading. >> >> Signed-off-by: Luca Fancellu <luca.fance...@arm.com> >> --- >> This is an RFC to get the feeling of the community about the name >> change, for now it's everything in one patch just to see how it >> will look like, if there is interest on proceeding into it, I can >> split in more commit. > > Have you discussed this with Dan and Chris at all? You haven't even > CC'd them.
No, this rename idea started from a chat during the summit, anyway Julien promptly add them to the CC, because I forgot. > > While there is a lot of end-goal in common between the dom0less and > hyperlaunch, and that the name dom0less is deeply misleading, > hyperlaunch is specifically not this. Yes Hyperlaunch is more than this, however as I said, with this RFC I would like to ear opinions, @Daniel @Christopher could it be a proper name for the dom0less feature? If this patch makes things more difficult for the Hyperlunch serie, I’m ok to drop it, my only aim was just to find a less misleading name for the feature. Cheers, Luca > > ~Andrew