On 03.05.2023 17:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The 1st patch (new in v2) has the effect of the 2nd one no longer
> affecting Arm.
>
> 1: restrict concept of pIRQ to x86
> 2: cmdline: document and enforce "extra_guest_irqs" upper bounds
REST- and Arm-maintainers,
may I please ask for some feedback here? Roger did supply some, resulting
in me considering to revert back to the earlier version (i.e. patch 1
dropped again and patch 2 minimally adjusted to address feedback there),
but which route to go wants input from other maintainers. What I think is
unacceptable is that we continue to not document and enforce the upper
bound, leading to people needlessly running into issues on big enough
systems.
Just to clarify, "the earlier version" was mistakenly not tagged v2, so
what is meant is the 2nd submission ('cmdline: document and enforce
"extra_guest_irqs" upper bounds'), not the 1st one ('cmdline: document
"extra_guest_irqs" upper bound').
Jan
