On 11.07.2023 09:27, Julien Grall wrote: > On 10/07/2023 08:33, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 03.05.2023 17:31, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> The 1st patch (new in v2) has the effect of the 2nd one no longer >>> affecting Arm. >>> >>> 1: restrict concept of pIRQ to x86 >>> 2: cmdline: document and enforce "extra_guest_irqs" upper bounds >> >> REST- and Arm-maintainers, >> >> may I please ask for some feedback here? Roger did supply some, resulting >> in me considering to revert back to the earlier version (i.e. patch 1 >> dropped again and patch 2 minimally adjusted to address feedback there), >> but which route to go wants input from other maintainers. What I think is >> unacceptable is that we continue to not document and enforce the upper >> bound, leading to people needlessly running into issues on big enough >> systems. > > I looked at patch #1, I think this the right approach for Arm. Do you > need further input?
I guess I'll reply to your comments on the patch itself. Feedback there was what I was pinging for. So thanks for getting back. Jan
