Hi,
On 18/10/2023 13:52, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
On 18/10/2023 14:38, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Nicola,
On 18/10/2023 13:30, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
On 17/10/2023 15:28, Julien Grall wrote:
I tested this, and the report is prevented by the ASSERT. It's up to
the maintainers to
decide how do you want to proceed: my suggestion is deviating it,
It is not clear to me what would you deviate. Can you clarify?
Cheers,
The memcpy call, as in:
/* SAF-x-false-positive-eclair */
memcpy(d->handle, config->handle, sizeof(d->handle));
I am not in favor of this deviation. It could be a false positive today,
but it may not be in the future.
I much prefer the ASSERT() version or the rework.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
