On 01.11.23 20:21, Jason Andryuk wrote:
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 5:34 AM Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com> wrote:

Add the code for connecting to frontends to xenlogd.

Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com>

diff --git a/tools/xenlogd/xenlogd.c b/tools/xenlogd/xenlogd.c
index 792d1026a3..da0a09a122 100644
--- a/tools/xenlogd/xenlogd.c
+++ b/tools/xenlogd/xenlogd.c

+static void connect_device(device *device)
+{
+    unsigned int val;
+    xenevtchn_port_or_error_t evtchn;
1.> +
+    val = read_frontend_node_uint(device, "version", 0);
+    if ( val != 1 )
+        return connect_err(device, "frontend specifies illegal version");
+    val = read_frontend_node_uint(device, "num-rings", 0);
+    if ( val != 1 )
+        return connect_err(device, "frontend specifies illegal ring number");

Linux uses 2 rings (XEN_9PFS_NUM_RINGS), and it doesn't connect when
max-rings is less than that.

max_rings = xenbus_read_unsigned(dev->otherend, "max-rings", 0);
if (max_rings < XEN_9PFS_NUM_RINGS)
     return -EINVAL;

new_device() writes max-rings as 1.  So this works for mini-os, but
not Linux.  I'm not requesting you to change it - just noting it.

Thanks for the note. I'll change it to allow more rings.


+
+    val = read_frontend_node_uint(device, "event-channel-0", 0);
+    if ( val == 0 )
+        return connect_err(device, "frontend specifies illegal evtchn");
+    evtchn = xenevtchn_bind_interdomain(xe, device->domid, val);
+    if ( evtchn < 0 )
+        return connect_err(device, "could not bind to event channel");
+    device->evtchn = evtchn;
+
+    val = read_frontend_node_uint(device, "ring-ref0", 0);
+    if ( val == 0 )
+        return connect_err(device, "frontend specifies illegal grant for 
ring");
+    device->intf = xengnttab_map_grant_ref(xg, device->domid, val,
+                                           PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
+    if ( !device->intf )
+        return connect_err(device, "could not map interface page");
+    device->ring_order = device->intf->ring_order;
+    if ( device->ring_order > 9 || device->ring_order < 1 )
+        return connect_err(device, "frontend specifies illegal ring order");
+    device->ring_size = XEN_FLEX_RING_SIZE(device->ring_order);
+    device->data.in = xengnttab_map_domain_grant_refs(xg,
+                                                      1 << device->ring_order,
+                                                      device->domid,
+                                                      device->intf->ref,
+                                                      PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
+    if ( !device->data.in )
+        return connect_err(device, "could not map ring pages");
+    device->data.out = device->data.in + device->ring_size;
+
+    if ( pthread_create(&device->thread, NULL, io_thread, device) )
+       return connect_err(device, "could not start I/O thread");
+    device->thread_active = true;
+
+    write_backend_state(device, XenbusStateConnected);
+}
+

@@ -122,6 +669,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
      int syslog_mask = LOG_MASK(LOG_WARNING) | LOG_MASK(LOG_ERR) |
                        LOG_MASK(LOG_CRIT) | LOG_MASK(LOG_ALERT) |
                        LOG_MASK(LOG_EMERG);
+    char **watch;
+    struct pollfd p[2] = {
+        { .events = POLLIN, .revents = POLLIN },

Are you intentionally setting revents to enter the loop initially?
Shouldn't the watch registration trigger it to fire anyway?

I don't remember where I got this from. Probably I really wanted to use
the first loop iteration already for processing the first response.

I think I can drop setting revents.


+        { .events = POLLIN }
+    };

      umask(027);
      if ( getenv("XENLOGD_VERBOSE") )
@@ -134,9 +686,26 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])

      xen_connect();

+    if ( !xs_watch(xs, "backend/xen_9pfs", "main") )
+        do_err("xs_watch() in main thread failed");
+    p[0].fd = xs_fileno(xs);
+    p[1].fd = xenevtchn_fd(xe);
+
+    scan_backend();
+
      while ( !stop_me )
      {
-        sleep(60);
+        while ( (p[0].revents & POLLIN) &&
+                (watch = xs_check_watch(xs)) != NULL )
+        {
+            handle_watch(watch[XS_WATCH_PATH], watch[XS_WATCH_TOKEN]);
+            free(watch);
+        }
+
+        if ( p[1].revents & POLLIN )
+            handle_event();
+
+        poll(p, 2, 10000);

Can you just use an infinite timeout and rely on the signal
interrupting the system call?

Yes, probably.


Juergen

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to