On 26.04.2024 10:14, Oleksii wrote: > On Thu, 2024-04-25 at 17:35 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> /* --------------------- Please tidy above here ----------------- >>> ---- */ >>> >>> #include <asm/bitops.h> >>> >>> +#ifndef arch_check_bitop_size >>> +#define arch_check_bitop_size(addr) >> >> Can this really do nothing? Passing the address of an object smaller >> than >> bitop_uint_t will read past the object in the generic__*_bit() >> functions. > Agree, in generic case it would be better to add: > #define arch_check_bitop_size(addr) (sizeof(*(addr)) < > sizeof(bitop_uint_t))
At which point x86 won't need any special casing anymore, I think. Jan
