On 2024-11-23 13:20, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
Add the ability to detect both a formal hyperlaunch device tree or a dom0less
device tree. If the hyperlaunch device tree is found, then count the number of
domain entries, reporting if more than one is found.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Smith <dpsm...@apertussolutions.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/domain_builder/core.c | 14 +++++++
xen/arch/x86/domain_builder/fdt.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
xen/arch/x86/domain_builder/fdt.h | 5 +++
xen/arch/x86/include/asm/bootinfo.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domain_builder/core.c
b/xen/arch/x86/domain_builder/core.c
index 211359895d84..a80f3711c306 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/domain_builder/core.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain_builder/core.c
@@ -40,7 +40,21 @@ void __init builder_init(struct boot_info *bi)
ret);
bi->hyperlaunch_enabled = false;
}
+ }
+
+ if ( bi->hyperlaunch_enabled )
+ {
+ int ret;
+
+ printk(XENLOG_INFO "Hyperlauch configuration:\n");
Hyperlaunch
+ if ( (ret = walk_hyperlaunch_fdt(bi)) < 0 )
+ {
+ printk(XENLOG_INFO " walk of device tree failed (%d)\n", ret);
+ bi->hyperlaunch_enabled = false;
+ return;
+ }
+ printk(XENLOG_INFO " Number of domains: %d\n", bi->nr_domains);
}
}
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domain_builder/fdt.c b/xen/arch/x86/domain_builder/fdt.c
index 3f9dda8c34c3..ff1ba58b6907 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/domain_builder/fdt.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain_builder/fdt.c
+int __init walk_hyperlaunch_fdt(struct boot_info *bi)
+{
+ int ret = 0, hv_node, node;
+ void *fdt = bootstrap_map_bm(&bi->mods[HYPERLAUNCH_MODULE_IDX]);
+
+ if ( unlikely(!fdt) )
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ hv_node = find_hyperlaunch_node(fdt);
+ if ( hv_node < 0 )
+ {
+ ret = hv_node;
+ goto err_out;
+ }
+
+ fdt_for_each_subnode(node, fdt, hv_node)
+ {
+ ret = fdt_node_check_compatible(fdt, node, "xen,domain");
+ if ( ret == 0 )
+ bi->nr_domains++;
+ }
+
+ /* Until multi-domain construction is added, throw an error */
+ if ( !bi->nr_domains || bi->nr_domains > 1 )
+ printk(XENLOG_ERR "Hyperlaunch only supports dom0 construction\n");
You continue execution - is that intended? It'll take the next module
as the kernel and try to boot? Would you rather panic?
Regards,
Jason
+ err_out:
bootstrap_unmap();
return ret;