Hi, On 2025/2/26 16:35, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 07:25:48PM +0100, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <[email protected]> >> --- >> CHANGELOG.md | 10 ++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md >> index 1979166820..e6c6144ef1 100644 >> --- a/CHANGELOG.md >> +++ b/CHANGELOG.md >> @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ The format is based on [Keep a >> Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/) >> - Fixed blkif protocol specification for sector sizes different than 512b. >> - The dombuilder in libxenguest no longer un-gzips secondary modules, >> instead >> leaving this to the guest kernel to do in guest context. >> + - Reduce xenstore library dependencies. >> + - On Arm: >> + - Several FF-A support improvements: add indirect messages support, >> transmit >> + RXTX buffer to the SPMC, fix version negotication and partition >> information >> + retrieval. >> - On x86: >> - Prefer ACPI reboot over UEFI ResetSystem() run time service call. >> - Prefer CMOS over EFI_GET_TIME as time source. >> @@ -25,6 +30,8 @@ The format is based on [Keep a >> Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/) >> interrupts instead of logical destination mode. >> >> ### Added >> + - Support device passthrough when dom0 is PVH on Xen. > > I've spoken with Jiqian from AMD and the QEMU side is still pending to > be merged, so I'm not sure I would list it here yet. Also AFAICT the > current work just enables passthrough from a PVH dom0 to an HVM domU, > but not to PV domUs. This would need to be clarified. Yes, I only added pci passthrough for HVM domUs when dom0 is PVH. And the qemu patch isn't merged yet. https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/bl1pr12mb58491271c360ce4345a915afe7...@bl1pr12mb5849.namprd12.prod.outlook.com/ I think we need to wait qemu patch merged and then you can add an entry like: - On x86: - Support pci passthrough for HVM domUs when dom0 is PVH.
> > Thanks, Roger. > -- Best regards, Jiqian Chen.
