>>> On 10.07.18 at 16:10, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>  -----Original Message-----
>> From: George Dunlap [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: 10 July 2018 15:01
>> To: Paul Durrant <[email protected]>; [email protected] 
>> Cc: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>; Andrew Cooper
>> <[email protected]>; George Dunlap
>> <[email protected]>; Ian Jackson <[email protected]>; Konrad
>> Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]>; Stefano Stabellini
>> <[email protected]>; Julien Grall <[email protected]>; Tim (Xen.org)
>> <[email protected]>; Wei Liu <[email protected]>; Jun Nakajima
>> <[email protected]>; Kevin Tian <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] iommu: make use of type-safe BFN and MFN
>> in exported functions
>> 
>> On 07/07/2018 12:05 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> > This patch modifies the declaration of the entry points to the IOMMU
>> > sub-system to use bfn_t and mfn_t in place of unsigned long. A
>> subsequent
>> > patch will similarly modify the methods in the iommu_ops structure.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <[email protected]>
>> > ---
>> > Cc: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
>> > Cc: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>
>> > Cc: George Dunlap <[email protected]>
>> > Cc: Ian Jackson <[email protected]>
>> > Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]>
>> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]>
>> > Cc: Julien Grall <[email protected]>
>> > Cc: Tim Deegan <[email protected]>
>> > Cc: Wei Liu <[email protected]>
>> > Cc: Jun Nakajima <[email protected]>
>> > Cc: Kevin Tian <[email protected]>
>> > Cc: George Dunlap <[email protected]>
>> >
>> > v2:
>> >  - Addressed comments from Jan.
>> >  - Use intermediate 'frame' variable to avoid directly encapsulating
>> >    mfn or gfn values as bfns.
>> 
>> Explain this one to me?  At the moment I don't see any value from having
>> the extra variable in the middle.
> 
> This was something that Jan wanted.

Ah, yes, it was in a reply to this patch's v1 that I had suggested a
neutrally named variable in case it can hold values from more than
one space. In the particular case of _get_page_type(), where I had
also given the v1 comment, I can't however see that it is now really
obvious that a 1:1 mapping is being established. To me that would
mean passing the same local variable (suitably type wrapped where
needed) twice into iommu_map_page(). It is not clear to me what
use a mfn_to_gmfn() invocation is inside a is_pv_domain() guarded
block, now that we don't permit translated PV domains anymore
(not that I would think that they had worked before the code was
removed).

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to