On 10/9/25 2:36 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 08.10.2025 22:11, Jason Andryuk wrote:
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -220,6 +220,23 @@ F: xen/drivers/acpi/
F: xen/include/acpi/
F: tools/libacpi/
+AMD IOMMU
+M: Jan Beulich<[email protected]>
+M: Andrew Cooper<[email protected]>
+M: Roger Pau Monné<[email protected]>
+R: Jason Andryuk<[email protected]>
+S: Supported
+F: xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/
+
+AMD SVM
+M: Jan Beulich<[email protected]>
+M: Andrew Cooper<[email protected]>
+M: Roger Pau Monné<[email protected]>
+R: Jason Andryuk<[email protected]>
+S: Supported
+F: xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/
+F: xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu_amd.c
What about xen/arch/x86/include/asm/hvm/svm/ ? It didn't need specific
mentioning on the X86 entry, but it would now. Also F: entries generally
want sorting alphabetically as well.
@@ -601,7 +618,8 @@ M: Roger Pau Monné<[email protected]>
S: Supported
L: [email protected]
F: xen/arch/x86/
-F: xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/
+X: xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/
+X: xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu_amd.c
Didn't the v1 discussion result in there being no need for these X:
entries?
As long as there's agreement, I'd be happy to make adjustments while
committing. Oleksii - I take it that ./MAINTAINERS changes can still go
in pretty freely?
Yes, you are right. Feel free to commit such changes without R-Acked-by.
~ Oleksii
