On 08.10.2025 22:11, Jason Andryuk wrote: > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -220,6 +220,23 @@ F: xen/drivers/acpi/ > F: xen/include/acpi/ > F: tools/libacpi/ > > +AMD IOMMU > +M: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> > +M: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]> > +M: Roger Pau Monné <[email protected]> > +R: Jason Andryuk <[email protected]> > +S: Supported > +F: xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/ > + > +AMD SVM > +M: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> > +M: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]> > +M: Roger Pau Monné <[email protected]> > +R: Jason Andryuk <[email protected]> > +S: Supported > +F: xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/ > +F: xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu_amd.c
What about xen/arch/x86/include/asm/hvm/svm/ ? It didn't need specific mentioning on the X86 entry, but it would now. Also F: entries generally want sorting alphabetically as well. > @@ -601,7 +618,8 @@ M: Roger Pau Monné <[email protected]> > S: Supported > L: [email protected] > F: xen/arch/x86/ > -F: xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/ > +X: xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/ > +X: xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu_amd.c Didn't the v1 discussion result in there being no need for these X: entries? As long as there's agreement, I'd be happy to make adjustments while committing. Oleksii - I take it that ./MAINTAINERS changes can still go in pretty freely? Jan
