On 24.11.2025 12:05, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 24.11.25 11:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 21.11.2025 14:23, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> --- a/Config.mk
>>> +++ b/Config.mk
>>> @@ -159,6 +159,19 @@ define move-if-changed
>>> if ! cmp -s $(1) $(2); then mv -f $(1) $(2); else rm -f $(1); fi
>>> endef
>>>
>>> +PATH_FILES := Paths
>>> +INC_FILES = $(foreach f, $(PATH_FILES), $(XEN_ROOT)/config/$(f).mk)
>>> +
>>> +include $(INC_FILES)
>>> +
>>> +BUILD_MAKE_VARS = $(foreach f, $(PATH_FILES), $(shell awk '$$2 == ":=" {
>>> print $$1; }' $(XEN_ROOT)/config/$(f).mk.in))
>>
>> Feels like my prior comments weren't really addressed. I continue to think
>> that
>> none of the above is part of what the subject says.
>
> I really don't understand your concern here.
>
> For replacing the @markers@ make needs to know what should be replaced.
> So it needs to scan the files containing the markers and gather them.
> This is what is done above.
>
> In the final macro below the replacements are done then. How would you
> handle that?
By passing (another) argument to the macro, for example. As indicated
earlier, different sub-trees may have different places where these
definitions live, and they would want to be able to pass that in
(ideally without needing to put this in a common part of the tree).
Jan
