I think that is fine: added it to the agenda
The discussion may benefit from Stefano, but it is probably too early for him
Lars
On 14/11/2018, 14:36, "Rich Persaud" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2018, at 04:56, Lars Kurth <lars.ku...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> the agenda is as follows:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RxW-iwcFFuKzNjjEqLEtiwFVHgAUlk35c0EtTkRE1k4/edit
> * Follow up on previous actions
> * PVH resource Mapping: Rian Quinn (AIS)
> * TMEM (Jan)
If there is time on today's call, I would like to add an agenda item to
discuss requirements collection for two Kconfig-defined subsets of Xen:
- minimal Xen hypervisor optimized for hardware support,
isolation/partitioning, secrets-free, safety certification, reduced attack
surface and performant nesting of Xen and other hypervisors, including Hyper-V,
KVM, ESX, Bromium uXen, bhyve
- full-featured Xen hypervisor optimized for guest operating systems,
unikernels, application-specific workloads and performant nesting on Xen and
other hypervisors
Related topics for discussion, possibly on a future call:
- which hypervisor has priority for inter-VM communication policy
enforcement
- scheduler interactions across bare-metal Xen, nested hypervisor and guest
OS
Daniel Smith (Apertus) will introduce the topic.
Rich
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
