>>> On 25.02.19 at 12:49, <andr2...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am not defending BUG() in any way which is obviously a no-go. > I am just trying to say that BUG() usage in the existing code needs to be > fixed first. Once done, we can then move to "default" w/o BUG()
Why? A first step to not make things worse is to not introduce further badness. Cleaning up existing issues is an independent (and perhaps parallel) effort. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel