>>> On 25.02.19 at 12:49, <andr2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am not defending BUG() in any way which is obviously a no-go.
> I am just trying to say that BUG() usage in the existing code needs to be
> fixed first. Once done, we can then move to "default" w/o BUG()

Why? A first step to not make things worse is to not introduce
further badness. Cleaning up existing issues is an independent
(and perhaps parallel) effort.

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to