On 2/25/19 2:11 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.02.19 at 12:49, <andr2...@gmail.com> wrote:
I am not defending BUG() in any way which is obviously a no-go.
I am just trying to say that BUG() usage in the existing code needs to be
fixed first. Once done, we can then move to "default" w/o BUG()
Why? A first step to not make things worse is to not introduce
further badness. Cleaning up existing issues is an independent
(and perhaps parallel) effort.
That was exactly my point and I have already agreed on that
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
