K wrote: >> OpenBSD is just a rebranded NetBSD made dog slow. >> >> Point being, it'll all come in due time, if you need it now, just use >> the OS >> you need to get it done, live without ZFS if you have to, if Xen is so >> important to you. As for security, this is hardly the right place to >> put >> that, and you obviously don't know about any of the Solaris security >> technologies. >> >> James > > You're such a troll :) Solaris security technologies... you mean stuff > like the recent -froot telnet bug? > > I am very familiar with Solaris security features... and exploit > mitigation is missing... > I don't care there are zones and least privilege features when I can't > protect my system from a simple heap overflow. > > There are tons of programmers out there working for Sun, Microsoft, > Oracle and open source projects who are incapable of writing secure > code and that's not going to change any time soon. At least on a linux > grsec kernel, on openbsd or on a windows xp sp2 most of their shitty > code will be harmless. > > I'm not trolling. You're the one who is. Linux is the system made by most of those amateurs you know, and grsec is hardly default. Let's not bring up the divide between projects, grsec, selinux, and plenty of tools that merely duplicate already existant features in others. That telnet bug only affects Solaris 10 U3, which isn't enabled by default anyways. I'm done talking with you, if you want things to be fixed, be professional and report the problems in a neutral way to the respective communities responsible for those areas. Simple stereotyping the whole system, all of Sun's developers and the community as being behind the times, dumb, or without care is just negligent. We can do without you. If you want to help, help, otherwise take your trolling elsewhere. Write your own crappy zfs implementation, I don't care, go away.
James _______________________________________________ xen-discuss mailing list [email protected]
