Re: [xen-discuss] HVM Windows: disk image vs. zvol - which is better?

Fri, 07 Dec 2007 05:31:39 -0800 

At mean time  I wouldn’t   move to Solaris xVM (76,77)  any production system, 
taking in acoount Sun hardware you intend to utilize for Solaris  xVM run
and development phase in which Solaris xVM is at mean time.
Just  for fun,  try Windows HVM  at  CentOS  5.1 on top of embedded Xen 3.1 
utilizing Linux LVs as  storage image and having  at least  2GB of RAM
“Quote:- The test machine is a C2D E6600 1GB RAM, sata hdd's”  
same CPU, same board and 250 GB SATA Drive with 16 MB cashed controller.
Next estimate the price for PC with:-
  Intel Core2Quad Q6600 <2.40GHz/1066MHz/8Mb>
  MB ASUS P5K64 WS
  8 GB RAM
  SATA HDD 250 GB (Seagate,WD)
Xen 3.1 enabled RHEL 5.1 (CentOS 5.1) would run oh this box pretty fast
(AHCI drivers with NCQ support)
However, I do realize that in just one year Solaris xVM may
be one of the best ways to go for Xen Virtualization
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
xen-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to