> > At mean time I wouldn’t move to Solaris xVM
> > (76,77) any production system, taking in acoount
> Sun
> > hardware you intend to utilize for Solaris xVM
> run
> > and development phase in which Solaris xVM is at
> mean
> > time.
>
> Well indeed, I know I must be careful here. I'm
> planning liveupgrade too, since that way there is a
> chance that it won't stop working :)
> (I read that under x86pv lu does not work, but under
> x86 it does, and a few hours service down is bearable
> on a ~monthly basis)
>
> > Just for fun, try Windows HVM at CentOS 5.1
> on
> > top of embedded Xen 3.1 utilizing Linux LVs as
> > storage image and having at least 2GB of RAM
> > Quote:- The test machine is a C2D E6600 1GB RAM,
> sata
> > hdd's”
> > same CPU, same board and 250 GB SATA Drive with 16
> MB
> > cashed controller.
>
> To be honest, I never played with linux that much.
> What I know of linux are the Sun Linux-to-Solaris
> (Blueprints?)documents. (can't remember the exact
> title at the moment, sorry) A few friends of mine
> utilise linux boxen, based on what I've seen, there
> aren't _that_ serious differences, but I'm afraid to
> run a linux.
Don't be afraid of RHEL 5.1 (CentOS 5.1 is free clone)
There is the only one noticeable difference CentOS is unsupported
Xen Hypervisor originally was created based on Linux Kernel 2.6.X (not sure)
and finally moved to 2.6.18 ( Xen 3.1).In my opinion RedHat (RHEL AS 5.0,5.1,
Fedora 7,8 ) provides very powerful and up to date Xen Virtualization (3.1)
right now.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
xen-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
