On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 13:20 -0400, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
> On Aug 28, 2006, at 1:10 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > Right. As long as we're changing this code, let's include copy_page().
> > ... which brings us back to the original patch a) removing the call to
> > mambo_memcpy(), and b) missing dcbtst.
> I think we should use the linux copy4kpage() strategy for this.. no
> sense reinventing the wheel.
I'm fine with copying whatever Linux does here. At least they've
unrolled it. :) It's just too bad it's 100% comment-free. :(
> We should also consider sending a linux patch upstream that has this
> function use dcbz or find out why they did not.
IBM Linux Technology Center
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list