Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Hopefully long term the 32-on-64 work that is going on will lead to ELF
>> code which doesn't need to be multiply compiled.
> 
> Why? It's simpler to compile it twice. I already posted draft patches to
> do this, simply introducing an elf32.c that #define-s the relevant
> symbols to alternative names and that only gets compiled when 64-bit
> arches need it for supporting 32-bit binaries.

My rewritten libxc domain builder takes a simliar approach ...

cheers,

  Gerd

-- 
Gerd Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.suse.de/~kraxel/julika-dora.jpeg

_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel

Reply via email to