On Aug 30, 2006, at 5:06 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:

On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 09:38 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 30.08.06 09:03 >>>
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 16:15 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
Hi Ian, these functions should be static. It would only be a style issue except PowerPC actually #includes elf.c twice, to support both 32- and
64-bit ELF binaries. Please apply.

Unfortunately they are referenced from outside this file

I'm not sure what a good short term fix for you would be. Perhaps some
preprocessor/CFLAGS magic to name them xen_elfnote32_foo and
xen_elfnote64_foo when compiling powerpc?

Hopefully long term the 32-on-64 work that is going on will lead to ELF
code which doesn't need to be multiply compiled.

Why? It's simpler to compile it twice. I already posted draft patches to
do this, simply introducing an elf32.c that #define-s the relevant
symbols to alternative names and that only gets compiled when 64-bit
arches need it for supporting 32-bit binaries.

Fair enough. I should probably have said something like "solves the
problem cleanly for everyone" rather than speculating about how we would
go about it ;-)

Ok now that we have established the "compile twice" strategy, then why don't we stick them in a new file called elfnote.c and keep them global?

Can we do the same for tools/libxc/xc_load_elf.c as well since its on my todo list to get that building twice too :)


Xen-ppc-devel mailing list

Reply via email to