On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 15:56 -0500, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
> >> We did a lot of work here so that stuff could be placed anywhere. I
> >> admit it was not pretty but I'd expect this patch to
> replace/improve
> >> not remove.
> >
> > The memmove below means this logic is unnecessary.
> I'd prefer some logic over blind moves of several megabytes (3-16),
> this will kill simulators.

Wait a minute, doesn't systemsim has a passthrough call for memmove? If
we should wire that up then this won't impact performance at all.

Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center

Xen-ppc-devel mailing list

Reply via email to