On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 15:56 -0500, Jimi Xenidis wrote: > > >> We did a lot of work here so that stuff could be placed anywhere. I > >> admit it was not pretty but I'd expect this patch to > replace/improve > >> not remove. > > > > The memmove below means this logic is unnecessary. > > I'd prefer some logic over blind moves of several megabytes (3-16), > this will kill simulators.
Wait a minute, doesn't systemsim has a passthrough call for memmove? If we should wire that up then this won't impact performance at all. -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Xen-ppc-devel mailing list Xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel