Hi list:

After following the install process for Convirt 2.0 community version (plus 
patch bundle 1 and some "glitches" with regards of me using a Debian "Lenny" 
server) my test enviro works more or less OK.

But while it seems quite OK for a test environment it seems not so good for a 
production one.  Some questions rise:

1) Is there any FAQ, Howto, etc. with regards of "properly" start convirt 
daemon-mode? i.e.: using apache plus mod_wsgi; not using paster 
with "development.ini"; not having such strong dependencies on environment 
variables but config entries, etc.

2) Install: current install procedures depend heavily on gaining access to the 
Internet and downloading quite a lot of Python modules which may or may not 
be reachable at the moment of installation, pushed forward to a new version, 
etc. all of this on its own tg2env which may or may not be shareable with 
other apps in the box.

3) Upgrade and promotion: is there any outlined protocol for proper upgrade? 
i.e.: upgrading from 0.x to 2.x is a matter of "start anew"; current patch 
policy is cummulative; what will happen when/if you produce a future "patch 
bundle 2"? will it be "pushable" on top of a patch bundle 1 + some patches?  
Will it be a proper migration path from 2.0 to a future 2.1?

4) Feature cutting: on previous releases command line access was avaliable 
while for 2.0, ACLs, command line and programmatic remote access (by means of 
XML-RPC) have been "pushed away" to the "enterprise version" (even more, it 
seems to be a 'post-facto' decision at the view of some "remainders" about 
ACLs and command line on current community code-base), which regreatably 
doesn't offer much confidence to us, third parties, in order to make a strong 
involvement with the tool: no one wants to be "locked in" with a tool less 
and less featured where more and more production-grade features move away to 
a pay-only (and not cheap, by the way) version.

5) End user/distribution license for "enterprise version".  Is it known under 
what license will be the "enterprise version" distributed?  By the fact that 
you ask for giving non-exclusive rights with any patch that any third-party 
could develop it seems obvious that you expect to distribute under a 
double-license model, more probably with the "enterprise versions" being 
under a closed one.  Will this be the case?  Don't you expect this to refrain 
third parties from sharing development with you?

Cheers.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
XenMan-Users mailing list
XenMan-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xenman-users

Reply via email to