Philippe Gerum wrote: > The current implementation is one thing (we could fix it), the purpose > of the tool is another, and actually, this is the latter which seems > useful to me. By sharing some common tests between native preemption and > real-time sub-systems like Xeno, we would make performance comparisons > more relevant.
Ok. I added the tool. I also had to add some cruft to configure.in to get the --wrap flags in src/testsuite/cyclic/Makefile. Now, running this test seem to have uncovered a bug with the binary heap based timers that the latency test did not show. I am investigating on this, but in the mean time, please do not enable the binary heap timers option. > Additionally, I'm convinced that the POSIX skin is an > underutilized goodie albeit it works damn well and obviously favours a > close integration within the Linux environment, simply because there is > a lack of explanation about it. Illustrating how one could leverage it > is always a good thing. Well, thanks. I believe that if the POSIX skin works well, it is simply because its testsuite has a good coverage. As for the documentation, you may have noticed that I am in the process of documenting the POSIX API, you can follow the progression here : http://download.gna.org/xenomai/documentation/trunk/html/api/group__posix.html Please, everybody, feel free to send comments, critics, patches. I guess you would like something like a POSIX API tour, but in order to write that, we would need a concrete example, such as, for example, playing .wav files with a PC speaker. -- Gilles Chanteperdrix. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaifirstname.lastname@example.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core