Daniel Simon wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:00:39 +0200 > Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Exectime is only updated on task switches. So you are not obtaining the true >> value when requesting your own data. Use the same formula for both cases. > > yes, but like that the fraction of time spent in the current execution is not > accounted, which might be sometimes useful (e.g. to integrate the cost of a > feedback scheduler in the total control budget)
Yeah, true, I applied the inverse logic. However, this interface is inconsistent, one should expects the same algorithm applied on both local as well as remote task queries. Why do you differentiate? > > another potentially useful feature would be also accounting the execution time > spent in secondary mode... no idea on how to do that. > BTW, Posix defines an optional CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME which is assumed to > provide > this measure ? This should work for shadow threads to retrieve their secondary-mode runtime. Give it a try. Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
