Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Probably. But it will definitely need full fast locking support inside
> xnsynch, which is basically about defining and maintaining a generic
> user-shared lock word from within xnsynch services that has at least a
> 'claimed' and a 'assignment pending' bit. Looks like we will not run out
> of work soon... ;)

The way xnsynch_sleep_on checks the owner field and retries for the
implementation of the lock stealing already furiously look like a mutex
compare and exchange...


Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to