Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm banging my head against this issue for several days now, first
>>> trying to sort out an unrelated bug I also came across at this chance,
>>> then trying to understand what happens, and finally getting mad about
>>> why this may only happen with Xenomai:
>> I have not tried to understand your problem (yet). But do you happen to
>> work with the latest TASK_ATOMICSWITCH changes? If yes, could you try to
>> revert them?
>
> Yes, I'm on latest trunk. During my debug endeavour, I haven't seen this
> task state being involved. Also, if I got this correctly, it only
> concerns the secondary->primary migration, and that one appears to be
> out of scope here. Nevertheless, it's easy to verify if you tell me
> which revision(s) I should revert.
Should be:
4bc557d998f7cfac0a069d0c47e28510ef270cb2
and:
acaccc82ead113f33f8f717fdafea14dba8b885d
--
Gilles.
_______________________________________________
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
