Wolfgang Mauerer wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> Wolfgang Mauerer wrote: >>>> ... and for reading the contents of the hostrt data. >>>> >>> Just realized: Please also update clocktest. Should already work with >>> the new clock ID, but requires a cosmetic output patch. >> Yes, I thought about that. Maybe even if clocktest uses the new >> clock_id, we could drop the example? >> >> I do not think it is a good idea to provide as an example code which >> uses the internals of the implementation (though it makes sense to use >> the implementation internals in the clocktest code). And if we remove >> that, only clock_gettime(CLOCK_HOST_REALTIME) remains, which does not >> seem to need an example. >> > > I would not keep it as an example, but as a test case for checking that > nothing is wrong with the data on the shared page. Which does not fit > quite well into clocktest. Although I have no problem with just omitting > the stuff if reading the (internal) content of the data page is deemed > inappropriate.
Well, I see nothing wrong with checking the internals at the beginning of clocktest is the clockid passed to clocktest is CLOCK_HOST_REALTIME. But Jan may have another opinion, since he is the one who wrote this code. -- Gilles. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core