Wolfgang Mauerer wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Wolfgang Mauerer wrote:
>>>> ... and for reading the contents of the hostrt data.
>>> Just realized: Please also update clocktest. Should already work with
>>> the new clock ID, but requires a cosmetic output patch.
>> Yes, I thought about that. Maybe even if clocktest uses the new
>> clock_id, we could drop the example?
>> I do not think it is a good idea to provide as an example code which
>> uses the internals of the implementation (though it makes sense to use
>> the implementation internals in the clocktest code). And if we remove
>> that, only clock_gettime(CLOCK_HOST_REALTIME) remains, which does not
>> seem to need an example.
> I would not keep it as an example, but as a test case for checking that
> nothing is wrong with the data on the shared page. Which does not fit
> quite well into clocktest. Although I have no problem with just omitting
> the stuff if reading the (internal) content of the data page is deemed
Well, I see nothing wrong with checking the internals at the beginning
of clocktest is the clockid passed to clocktest is CLOCK_HOST_REALTIME.
But Jan may have another opinion, since he is the one who wrote this code.
Xenomai-core mailing list