On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 22:42 +0100, ronny meeus wrote: > Hello > > we are investigating to usage of the pSOS+ skin to port a large legacy > pSOS application to Linux. > The application model consist of several processes in which the > application lives. All processes will make use of the pSOS library. > > After playing around with the library for some time we have observed > several missing service calls, bugs and differences in behaviour > compared to a real pSOS implementation: > - missing sm_ident
http://git.xenomai.org/?p=xenomai-rpm.git;a=commit;h=26e916ecc3f8b71cd8ce4c4194555ee0cc4aa018 > - missing t_getreg / t_setreg in userland (patch already included in > 2.5.5) > - not possible to use skin from the context of different processes > (patch already included in 2.5.5) > - added support for identical task/queue/semaphore/region names by > making names unique. > - strange behaviour in pSOS message queue (see post "Possible memory > leak in psos skin message queue handling"). > > I can (and will) deliver patches for all issues I have found, but I'm > wondering whether there are other people using the pSOS skin (in > userland) in a real live application. The target for my project would > be an embedded system with strong reliability requirements (very > stable / long running etc). > Any feedback is welcome and appreciated. > > It is not clear to me either which tests are executed before a new > version is released. Is there any test-suite available for the pSOS > skin? > > Best regards, > Ronny > > > _______________________________________________ > Xenomai-core mailing list > Xenomai-core@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core -- Philippe. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
