Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Mm, this really looks like some firmware/BIOS cyclic activity, that 
> would hit the busy loop more or less frequently, depending on the 
> internal timing of the outer loop. This reminds me that some recent 
> Intel chipset are known to prevent global SMI disabling actually, maybe 
> this is the case here, so our work-around would be basically useless. 
> Another usual suspect is NMI handling (which the Adeos layer does not 
> pipeline but rather delivers immediately), but I guess that you did not 
> activate the NMI watchdog anyway, so back to square #1, I guess.

No, I never enabled the NMI watchdog.

Yeah, that doesn't sound good for me. I just tried, for the first time,
allowing SMI to remain enabled. Behaves exactly the same :(  A failure
to disable SMI would also explain why none of my peripherals were ever
affected.

I thought SMI was supposed to increase latencies, but I only see
latencies < 60us at any load, unless I start video capture. Does the
latency test absolutely rule out SMI as the cause? Is there any way to
check whether SMI is actually disabled?

Thanks,
Saul.

_______________________________________________
Xenomai-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help

Reply via email to