Hi Wolfgang,
Just to answer an open question still
> BTW, what are the latencies you measure on your system under load
> (without RT-Socket-CAN).
lat min 20.952
lat ave 31.009
lat max 60.504
lat best 19.276
this was with the loading as you described in this thread and running
for 12 hours.
Anything special about the above figures? Not very good I presume but
I am not running with tsc enabled.
Kind regards,
Roland
Roland
>
> Wolfgang.
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Roland
>>
>>
>>
>> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>> Hallo,
>>>
>>> in the meantime I have measured the latencies introduced through
>>> messages sent and received by RT-Socket-CAN. The SJA1000 register
>>> access times on my rather old PC with an Athlon 1100 Mhz are:
>>>
>>> PEAK-Dongle: read access: 11807 ns
>>> PEAK-Dongle: write access: 11677 ns
>>>
>>> IXXAT-PCI : read access: 729 ns
>>> IXXAT-PCI : write access: 305 ns
>>>
>>> I measured an increase of the latency of approx. 170us with the
>>> PEAK-Dongle and approx 13us with the IXXAT-PCI card for the reception
>>> of a full CAN message (with 8 bytes payload). Sending messages is a
>>> bit less disturbing. I have attached a small patch to measure the
>>> SJA1000 register access times when the driver is initialized. You are
>>> welcome to apply it on your setup and report the results. I'm
>>> especially interested in numbers for the ISA bus (or PC-104).
>>>
>>> Wolfgang.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> + diff -u xenomai/ksrc/drivers/can/rtcan_dev.c.IOTEST
>>> xenomai/ksrc/drivers/can/rtcan_dev.c
>>> + diff -u xenomai/ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_sja1000.c.IOTEST
>>> xenomai/ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_sja1000.c
>>> --- xenomai/ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_sja1000.c.IOTEST
>>> 2007-02-26 09:17:27.000000000 +0100
>>> +++ xenomai/ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_sja1000.c 2007-03-13
>>> 10:01:47.000000000 +0100
>>> @@ -728,6 +728,30 @@
>>> if (chip == NULL)
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> +#if 1
>>> + {
>>> + nanosecs_abs_t begin, diff;
>>> + volatile u8 reg;
>>> + int i, count = 100000;
>>> + begin = rtdm_clock_read();
>>> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>>> + reg = chip->read_reg(dev, 0);
>>> + }
>>> + diff = rtdm_clock_read() - begin;
>>> + printk("%s: register read time for %d accessed: %ld (%ld per
>>> access)\n",
>>> + dev->board_name, count,
>>> + (unsigned long)diff, (unsigned long)diff / count);
>>> + begin = rtdm_clock_read();
>>> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>>> + chip->write_reg(dev, 0, reg);
>>> + }
>>> + diff = rtdm_clock_read() - begin;
>>> + printk("%s: register write time for %d accessed: %ld (%ld per
>>> access)\n",
>>> + dev->board_name, count,
>>> + (unsigned long)diff, (unsigned long)diff / count);
>>> + }
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> /* Set dummy state for following call */
>>> dev->state = CAN_STATE_ACTIVE;
>>> /* Enter reset mode */
>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xenomai-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
_______________________________________________
Xenomai-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
