Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Roland Tollenaar wrote:
>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>
>>>> See below. This does not look good. Does it mean that I am only 
>>>> always reading out the last socket and the rest are having their 
>>>> buffers pumped full? Should I be unbinding somehow?
>>> Don't know, check your code ;-).
>> Thanks that is exactly what I did because I thought I was unbinding. 
>> rt_dev_close () should do that for me correct? Its not. At least not 
>> reliably. :(
> 
> That's wired. You mean you called rt_dev_close() and the socket still 
> does show up in /proc/rtcan_sockets? Is it possible that there is 
> another task still using that socket? Could you show the code fragment 
> doing that.

Recall that up to Xenomai 2.4 RTDM device/socket closing may fail (with
-EAGAIN) when some other thread is currently using it and doesn't
release it immediately when being "asked". That means for now you should
loop over [rt_dev_]close as long as EAGAIN is returned.

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Xenomai-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help

Reply via email to