Jan Kiszka wrote: > Dennis Nguyen wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I built 2.6.22.10 linux kernel -i386 with xenomai 2.4-rc4 and >> adeos-ipipe-2.6.22-i386-1.10-09.patch. >> >> I checked enable SMI workaround, uncheck frequency scaling, uncheck ACPI >> and uncheck APM. >> >> I ran xeno-test and get the following failed message: >> >> Thu Oct 25 13:17:02 PDT 2007 >> running: ./run -- -sh -T 120 -t1 # latency >> * >> * >> * Type ^C to stop this application. >> * >> * >> == Sampling period: 100 us >> == Test mode: in-kernel periodic task >> == All results in microseconds >> latency: failed to open benchmark device, code -19 >> (modprobe xeno_timerbench?) >> >> Thu Oct 25 13:17:04 PDT 2007 >> running: ./run -- -sh -T 120 -t2 # latency >> * >> * >> * Type ^C to stop this application. >> * >> * >> == Sampling period: 100 us >> == Test mode: in-kernel timer handler >> == All results in microseconds >> latency: failed to open benchmark device, code -19 >> (modprobe xeno_timerbench?) >> >> Could you help me to solve the issue? >> > > What does the kernel log say (=>dmesg) when you manually insert the > module (=>modprobe xeno_timerbench)? Do you still have versioning > conflicts with your modules (as reported on rtnet-users)? > > Jan > >
I could not find xeno_timerbench. How to include the xeno_timerbench when it is built? I got: [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# modprobe xeno_timerbench FATAL: Module xeno_timerbench not found. I don't know about the versioning conflicts. Thanks, Dennis _______________________________________________ Xenomai-help mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
