Dennis Nguyen wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Dennis Nguyen wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I built 2.6.22.10 linux kernel -i386 with xenomai 2.4-rc4 and >>> adeos-ipipe-2.6.22-i386-1.10-09.patch. >>> >>> I checked enable SMI workaround, uncheck frequency scaling, uncheck ACPI >>> and uncheck APM. >>> >>> I ran xeno-test and get the following failed message: >>> >>> Thu Oct 25 13:17:02 PDT 2007 >>> running: ./run -- -sh -T 120 -t1 # latency >>> * >>> * >>> * Type ^C to stop this application. >>> * >>> * >>> == Sampling period: 100 us >>> == Test mode: in-kernel periodic task >>> == All results in microseconds >>> latency: failed to open benchmark device, code -19 >>> (modprobe xeno_timerbench?) >>> >>> Thu Oct 25 13:17:04 PDT 2007 >>> running: ./run -- -sh -T 120 -t2 # latency >>> * >>> * >>> * Type ^C to stop this application. >>> * >>> * >>> == Sampling period: 100 us >>> == Test mode: in-kernel timer handler >>> == All results in microseconds >>> latency: failed to open benchmark device, code -19 >>> (modprobe xeno_timerbench?) >>> >>> Could you help me to solve the issue? >>> >> >> What does the kernel log say (=>dmesg) when you manually insert the >> module (=>modprobe xeno_timerbench)? Do you still have versioning >> conflicts with your modules (as reported on rtnet-users)? >> >> Jan >> >> > > I could not find xeno_timerbench. How to include the xeno_timerbench > when it is built? > I got: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# modprobe xeno_timerbench > FATAL: Module xeno_timerbench not found. > > I don't know about the versioning conflicts.
Did you enable the timer benchmark in the kernel configuration (Xenomai menu -> drivers -> testing -> timer benchmark)ß Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-help mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
