> The current roadmap is to let Xenomai 3 come in two flavors: one based > on PREEMPT-RT (Xenomai/Solo), the other (Xenomai/Duo) using Adeos/I-pipe > and a second scheduler like Xenomai 2 does, but supporting much less > legacy than the latter (no kernel 2.4, no in-kernel RT applications > etc.). So depending on your requirements and PREEMPT-RT's progress, > you'll be able to chose the fitting platform or even switch between them > without too much effort. > > Jan > > Thanks again Jan.
Another point; for RT USB developers, do you think we could use Linux native USB stack with PREEMPT_RT in the same way as Xenomai / USB4RT ? I'm pleased with this last solution but the USB4RT bug (need to send a command twice) is a real problem for performances (i'd like to increase my acquisition rate within a fixed cycle). My only approach to real time for the moment is USB driver, and in the Open world i cannot find what could be the "right" or "best" solution... _______________________________________________ Xenomai-help mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
