Katsuhiko Isono wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> Katsuhiko Isono wrote:
>>> I use linux-2.6.26 + xenomai-2.4.10 with custom arm(i.mx31) board.
>>>
>>> When realtime application was executed on my environment,
>>> application caused the SIGSEGV fault about once every several hours.
>>>
>>> However, when I applied "arm: fix mm switching" patch of
>> xenomai-2.5 to
>>> my environment, SIGSEGV fault did not happen.
>>>
>>> There is a following question.
>>> - Is this patch effective also for 2.4.10 ?
>>> - What trouble is corrected with this patch ?
>> The version of the I-pipe patch you are using has another
>> known bug than
>> the one fixed by the "arm: fix mm switching" patch (by the way, to be
>> sure that we are talking about the same patch, I would prefer an URL
>> pointing to xenomai's gitweb), the bug mentioned here:
>>
>> https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-core/2009-08/msg00021.html
>>
>> And the fix for this bug in the I-pipe patches which comes
>> with Xenomai
>> 2.4.10 should fix both bugs.
>>
>> So, in short, do you oberve the segmentation faults when using the
>> I-pipe patches which ship with Xenomai 2.4.10 rather than
>> whatever patch
>> you are using for linux 2.6.26?
>>
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> I use linux-2.6.26 of Freescale BSP because I develop custom board.
Actually, I do not really understand this argument. It looks as easy to
develop a custom board support with the mainline kernel as with a vendor
version. And at least, with the mainline kernel, you are not stuck with
whatever version the vendor chose.
--
Gilles.
_______________________________________________
Xenomai-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
